When you are a person with a large audience, the world puts a responsibility on you: to eliminate all cruel events, live them, "bring the truth to the masses." A clear consequence is how, for example, recently many people lashed out with hatred at people who kept silent about the situation between Russia and Ukraine. What can we say, resentment fell not only on people with a large audience, people began to quarrel with relatives - someone because his close person was silent, and someone because his close person said something.
We do not always think about the reasons that may remain silent. We all have different degrees of sensitivity, and those who have a high degree of sensitivity find it difficult to live in a stream of negative news. It becomes even harder to realize that there is little you can change. This leads to a feeling of hopelessness.
Everyone experiences this feeling in their own way. For some, the news that one explosion in some city crippled an entire family remains just a picture and text somewhere beyond the screen and far away, while someone else lives this pain as their own.
Various information settles inside in the form of black fallouts, and even when we try to clear them, they leave a gray mark. All this is exacerbated by events from your own life, and at such moments the pain either loses its limit or becomes chronic, like a white vacuum around you.
Controversial questions arise: can we hate those who are silent? Can we oblige anyone to become a wrestler? Does everyone have the right to take care of themselves while other people are hurting?
Who is more cruel in this situation - the one who is silent or the one who attacks with hatred? Who is more selfish - the one who is silent or the one who requires others to act like him?
I think that answers can be found through the very understanding of oneself: if I am silent - why, if I speak - why. I think that in this situation there are no wrong actions, there are wrong intentions.
